Home > RBP's Thoughts > You Thought Those Photos on Facebook Were Deleted?

You Thought Those Photos on Facebook Were Deleted?

June 17th, 2009

Sourced From Yahoo – by Christopher Null

It’s always fun to write about research that you can actually try out for yourself.

Try this: Take a photo and upload it to Facebook, then after a day or so, note what the URL to the picture is (the actual photo, not the page on which the photo resides), and then delete it. Come back a month later and see if the link works. Chances are: It will.

Facebook isn’t alone here. Researchers at Cambridge University (so you know this is legit, people!) have found that nearly half of the social networking sites don’t immediately delete pictures when a user requests they be removed. In general, photo-centric websites like Flickr were found to be better at quickly removing deleted photos upon request.

Why do “deleted” photos stick around so long? The problem relates to the way data is stored on large websites: While your personal computer only keeps one copy of a file, large-scale services like Facebook rely on what are called content delivery networks to manage data and distribution. It’s a complex system wherein data is copied to multiple intermediate devices, usually to speed up access to files when millions of people are trying to access the service simultaneously. (Yahoo! Tech is served by dozens of servers, for example.) But because changes aren’t reflected across the CDN immediately, ghost copies of files tend to linger for days or weeks.

In the case of Facebook, the company says data may hang around until the URL in question is reused, which is usually “after a short period of time.” Though obviously that time can vary considerably.

Of course, once a photo escapes from the walled garden of a social network like Facebook, the chances of deleting it permanently fall even further. Google’s caching system is remarkably efficient at archiving copies of web content, long after it’s removed from the web. Anyone who’s ever used Google Image Search can likely tell you a story about clicking on a thumbnail image, only to find that the image has been deleted from the website in question — yet the thumbnail remains on Google for months. And then there are services like the Wayback Machine, which copy entire websites for posterity, archiving data and pictures forever.

The lesson: Those drunken party photos you don’t want people to see? Simply don’t upload them to the web, ever, because trying to delete them after you sober up is a tough proposition.

RBP – so think about it very long and hard before you post those bikini shots, bathing suit pictures (guys), drunken pictures, pictures of you under the influence of something, pictures with significant others that might not be your ‘real” significant other.

richardbrianpenn RBP's Thoughts

  1. Parker
    June 17th, 2009 at 06:22 | #1

    Yeah my girlfriend got all banged up over me having pictures with chicks. So check I take them down and they still show up. Maybe I have to get rid of the girlfriend.

  2. June 17th, 2009 at 07:16 | #2

    Looking at the poor dude covered with pen brings back such memories. We drew a skunk stripe in a guy’s hair with that liquid paper stuff and it wouldn’t come out. He had to shave his head.

  3. June 17th, 2009 at 11:03 | #3

    Those 2 girls were at one of our PhillyGspot parties? Weren’t they?

  4. Mark
    June 17th, 2009 at 15:01 | #4

    I had pictures of me and my ex girlfriend on facebook. We broke up. I deleted them or so I thought. now I know better

  5. June 17th, 2009 at 15:56 | #5

    Looking at the first picture just makes me think, “Wow, that’s one hungry lesbian.”

    Which reminds me of a joke.

    What’s the difference between a dyke and a lesbian?

    Answer: Lesbians are hot.

  6. June 18th, 2009 at 07:39 | #6

    Great post! People really need to think about how they want to be viewed online.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
This site is using OpenAvatar based on